Thanks FedEx, This Is Why We Keep Getting Phished (2024)

(troyhunt.com)

139 points | by stymaar 1 hour ago

14 comments

  • kencausey 48 minutes ago
    In a recent example my step-mother, who is constantly getting cloud storage full scam emails, received an email from Google about 75% full storage that appears to be fully valid. However all the links use a domain c.gle and whois c.gle errors with "getaddrinfo(whois.nic.gle): Name or service not known". whois gle however does work. I was not sure of the validity of c.gle myself, my step-mother would have no idea.
    • inigyou 37 minutes ago
      Whois has been replaced by RDAP.
      • b112 21 minutes ago
        There are whois servers, and the whois command, so no, it has not.

        I agree that this is the goal.

        • inigyou 5 minutes ago
          Clearly there is not a whois server here
  • lemursage 33 minutes ago
    This is so weird, seeing this. Two years ago, I got a customs notice from FedEx asking to fill in my details. That was just a plain email from __some guy__ at FedEx with a PDF file attached. I wasn't expecting any package.

    I wrote to their chatbot (of course, no human assistance) and after some time of "prompt engineering," or what one might call coercing, it finally directed me to a human consultant who confirmed it was indeed not a scam, and that it was indeed their messaging.

    I opened the PDF, and it was pre-filled with someone else's data, with blank rectangles placed over fields in a bad attempt at redacting them (you could just move those rectangles around to reveal the underlying data).

    The package later turned out to be a surprise from collaborators abroad. Years later, I still feel that scam aftertaste whenever I see the FedEx logo.

  • Cider9986 16 minutes ago
    >Our Australian Communications and Media Authority body (ACMA) recently reported 336M blocked scam SMSs

    Australia has mandatory identity verification for getting a SIM card.

    The FCC is now proposing [1] to add a rule to require government ID, physical address, and alternative phone number for every phone line in the US.

    KYC for phone lines would cause more IDs to be leaked, and more American dollars lost to scammers and fraudsters.

    [1] https://www.404media.co/fcc-wants-to-kill-burner-phones-by-f...

    Discussion:

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48462308

  • walrus01 55 minutes ago
    I swear, the proliferation of random ".xyz" type gTLD is not making things any easier in stopping non tech people from clicking on phishing links. There's so damn many of them. Sure, if they didn't exist people would use phishing domains like "fedex-secure-delivery-approval.com" or something, I suppose...

    List of top level domains: https://data.iana.org/TLD/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt

    • dqv 22 minutes ago
      For the past 2 years I've gotten backscatter from a phishing campaign that uses a domain I own in the from address. Every single domain they try to get the victims to click on is a .com

      The most recent one is detention-unit.com, which probably does trick a lot of the people getting these phishing emails since the targets don't seem to speak English as a first language.

      As an aside, an alarming number of server admins don't check SPF so these emails are actually getting into people's inboxes.

    • cosmic_cheese 37 minutes ago
      The menagerie of TLDs is somewhat a necessary evil in my view. Prior to them it was becoming nearly impossible to get a decent domain, with most of them already having been laid claim to by squatters, big companies, and startups with VC money to burn.
    • ddtaylor 24 minutes ago
      I'm not convinced that would help.

      The problem is that large companies and government agencies are both misusing and NOT using the appropriate trust anchor - their fucking domain.

      Its just attempting to work around incompetence, which always just shows up again somewhere else.

    • inigyou 36 minutes ago
      This was a calculated project by ICANN to 1. bring lots more money to ICANN and 2. prevent decentralisation of the DNS root away from the control of the USA.
  • mixdup 46 minutes ago
    There is a similar issue with the IRS. If you call the IRS they use a text-to-speech system to generate the voice for their call tree IVR. The problem is, it's a commercially available system that fake call center scammers also use, so they sound identical. It also doesn't help that it sounds fake and scammy, so you can't use that as a signal to avoid the number you're calling, either
    • grishka 14 minutes ago
      With calls, it's easier: if you get an incoming call with someone is asking you for money, you hang up and call back using the number for that organization that you've found yourself from official sources. Never trust incoming calls when it comes to money.
      • mixdup 3 minutes ago
        I know that, does my grandmother? In the heat of the moment, will she remember that I told her 2 years ago when they call her?
  • jhbadger 36 minutes ago
    It reminds me how at work we had to take a course hosted on our domain about how to recognize phishing and a few days later we got an e-mail from outside our domain saying we had to take a course about a different subject on their domain. We got an email from management a week or so later that complained that so few people had completed the new training -- because we all assumed it was a phishing attempt because it was exactly the sort of thing the phishing course talked about!
    • starky 26 minutes ago
      We have a training thing at work that sends out phishing emails and you are supposed to report them using a handy button in the email app. If they are training emails you get a good job website that pops up. I greatly enjoy reporting every single genuine email that reads anything like a potential phishing email as there is someone in IT that reviews them and probably gets annoyed at the various groups sending sketchy emails for official business.
  • eventualcomp 27 minutes ago
    If I had a nickel for every post I saw on HN front page involving companies confusing people on phishing-like patterns today, I would have two nickels. Which is not a lot but still weird that it happened twice.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49172834

  • chuckadams 52 minutes ago
    I remember receiving a genuine "verify your account" email from PayPal way back. The phishers didn't make it up, they were just copying actual emails PayPal sent their own users.
  • antonvs 8 minutes ago
    I wouldn’t assume that email is genuine. “Hi,” and “…the B-point link that I’ve sent”? Dodgy AF.

    My first suspicion would be that they’re getting hold of the Fedex invoice data, via a software compromise or an insider.

    If it really is real, then wow, FedEx Australia sounds like it’s one guy operating out of a shipping container down at the docks.

  • darth_avocado 59 minutes ago
    Do they build their own software or contract it to the consultants?
  • agency 42 minutes ago
    This shit drives me insane. Last year I had my home insurer send me a link in an SMS pointing me to allstate.yem.bo to collect some information. Stop training your users to get phished!!
  • antonvs 21 minutes ago
    > Why are the "D" and the "T" capitalised? Dodgy AF!

    You should be more respectful, you’ve clearly received a Message direct from President Trump!

  • Doohickey-d 59 minutes ago
    Discussed previously, 2024, 564 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39479001
  • siftagent 45 minutes ago
    [flagged]